The design of public spaces, especially transportation areas, is usually oriented towards cars. This is considered “normal”, yet it takes up a lot of space and increases fossil energy consumption as well as air pollution and noise pollution – in addition to endangering our health.
This way of valuing cars and designing spaces is supported by the language used by the media who report on mobility and transportation. Research shows that the language used typically establishes cars as the norm. Other forms of transportation like walking, biking, or public transportation are then portrayed as inferior. In this way, language use impedes a shift towards more sustainable, safer forms of mobility.
For example, if an accident report states that a cyclist got “run over” by a truck, the truck appears as a force of nature – similar to an avalanche that one gets caught and buried under. The role of the truck driver and the design of the transportation space are hidden from view. The example shows: The way media report on traffic and mobility is linked with perspectives we are seldom conscious of. Inevitably, the reporting also conveys particular attitudes and values.
Project goals and results
Changing our behaviours around mobility and public space also demands language that reflects a sustainable, climate-conscious approach to transportation.