A core objective of CDE’s overall strategy is to conduct transformative research – research that aims to contribute to concrete sustainability transformations. CDE’s research takes place in a multitude of different contexts. These contexts strongly influence our research, our outputs, and our proposed sustainability solutions. Moreover, CDE is highly present in intercultural research settings and partly focuses on contexts in the Global South.
A given context may be experiencing violent conflict. Or it may be in a post-war situation. But even if conflicts are non-violent or not obvious, research contexts are often marked by colonial and postcolonial history. This may mean that injustices of the past persist in their currently manifested societal and relational consequences.
Independently of their respective history, the socio-political and socio-cultural configurations that characterize the contexts CDE works in are highly complex and unique: they may differ significantly from the assumptions, both explicit or implicit, on which a research endeavour is built. In addition, the research setting is likely to include a complex range of intercultural and interpersonal conflicts and challenges.
A need for constant reflection
Without high contextual awareness, conflict sensitivity, and high reflexivity on power imbalances, project designs, and one’s own cultural practices and norms, research may reproduce or even augment power differences and prejudices. It can thus unintentionally cause more harm than gain, where sustainability is concerned. This is why there is a need for constant reflection on our own actions and projects within a research context. CDE is therefore striving for the design of research projects to be as fair and sensitive to the context and (potential) conflicts as possible.
The term fair research used here encompasses the whole gradient of ethical challenges and potential conflicts ranging from the fair set-up of funding and ethical implementation of research projects (distribution of funds, agenda setting, collaboration with partners etc.), ethical challenges in the field (interaction with and protection of local staff, research participants etc.) to awareness of cultural and value differences. This has to be guided by the principle of leaving no one behind, especially not those with little power and voice, as well as by the minimum aim of “doing no harm” through research and interactions. CDE’s endeavour is closely linked to the currently much-discussed topic of decolonizing research and education.